SOME ASPECTS OF THE DIALECTIC OF FASCISM

The article examines the foundations of the paradoxes of ideology and the practice of various forms of fascism, which lie in the conditions of the historical formation and development of this socio-political phenomenon. The article defines fascism and provides evidence that, regardless of its manifestation or national characterization, fascism constitutes an explicit and most brutal form of the rule of capital. It demonstrates that all components of a fascist state – both the overt dictatorship of financial bourgeoisie (legislative, executive, and judicial powers) and all other structures of the ideological superstructure (mass media, education, and culture) – are subordinated to the dictatorship of financial bourgeoisie. This argument is illustrated through the historical formation and development of a well-known country. The resolution of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland is presented, declaring July 11 as the National Day of Remembrance for the Poles – victims of genocide committed by the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN) and the Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) in the eastern territories of the Second Polish Republic – as a legal fact and evidence supporting the ideas outlined. The idea is substantiated that the dialectic of fascism is, in essence, dialectic of alibi. It is not merely the dialectic of essence and phenomenon, reality and appearance, but rather the dialectic of the real, which consciously masquerades as it’s opposite.